search for: d77144

Hi llvm-dev, I have a patch open for review that removes waymarking https://reviews.llvm.org/D77144. This patch removes waymarking and replaces it with storing a pointer to the User in the Use. when compiling the CTMark tests of the test suite, this give an average of +1.8% max memory use and -1.1% compile time. Removing Waymarking also simplifies the code of Use and User. Any thought? Cheer...

Yes please. On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 5:02 AM Tyker1 at outlook.com via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > a bit of time has passed and there to my knowledge still no strong > arguments against removing it. > is everyone OK to proceed with the removal ? > > Gauthier > ------------------------------ > *From:* Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org> >

...ner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Apr 1, 2020, at 5:51 AM, Tyker1 at outlook.com via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Hi llvm-dev, > > I have a patch open for review that removes waymarking > https://reviews.llvm.org/D77144. > > This patch removes waymarking and replaces it with storing a pointer to > the User in the Use. > when compiling the CTMark tests of the test suite, this give an average > of +1.8% max memory use and -1.1% compile time. > > Removing Waymarking also simplifies the code of U...