Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d76398".
2020 Mar 24
3
Status of Intel JCC Mitigations and Next Steps
...ence.
Why am I pushing for a decision now?
There are two major reasons. First, there have recently been a couple
of patches posted and landed (D76176, and D76052) building towards the
automagic assembler variant. And second, I've started getting review
comments (https://reviews.llvm.org/D76398#1930383) which block forward
progress on generalized padding support assuming the automagic
interpretation. Implementing the automatic assembler variant for prefix
and immediate padding adds substantial complexity and I would very much
like not to bother with if I don't have to.
Current...
2020 Mar 25
3
Status of Intel JCC Mitigations and Next Steps
...ing for a decision now?
>
> There are two major reasons. First, there have recently been a couple of
> patches posted and landed (D76176, and D76052) building towards the
> automagic assembler variant. And second, I've started getting review
> comments (https://reviews.llvm.org/D76398#1930383) which block forward
> progress on generalized padding support assuming the automagic
> interpretation. Implementing the automatic assembler variant for prefix
> and immediate padding adds substantial complexity and I would very much
> like not to bother with if I don't hav...
2020 Mar 25
2
Status of Intel JCC Mitigations and Next Steps
...dience.
Why am I pushing for a decision now?
There are two major reasons. First, there have recently been a couple of patches posted and landed (D76176, and D76052) building towards the automagic assembler variant. And second, I've started getting review comments (https://reviews.llvm.org/D76398#1930383) which block forward progress on generalized padding support assuming the automagic interpretation. Implementing the automatic assembler variant for prefix and immediate padding adds substantial complexity and I would very much like not to bother with if I don't have to.
Current imp...