Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d75882".
Did you mean:
375882
2020 Mar 09
3
RFC: Making a common successor/predecessor interface
...ke this happen, but I'd like the
community's thoughts on this before deep-diving into code reviews.
For some concrete view of what the changes look like, I uploaded two
preliminary patches:
(1) part 1: D75881 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75881>: Introducing class
specific iterators
(2) D75882 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75882>
(1) part 2: pending: Cleaning up existing usages; example replacement:
`succ_begin(BB)` with `BB->succ_begin()`.
(1) part3/4: pending: Add class specific iterators to `Instruction` and
clean up existing usages just as for `BasicBlock`.
I split the above (...
2020 Mar 10
4
RFC: Making a common successor/predecessor interface
...thoughts on this before deep-diving into code reviews.
>>
>> For some concrete view of what the changes look like, I uploaded two
>> preliminary patches:
>> (1) part 1: D75881 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75881>: Introducing class
>> specific iterators
>> (2) D75882 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75882>
>> (1) part 2: pending: Cleaning up existing usages; example replacement:
>> `succ_begin(BB)` with `BB->succ_begin()`.
>> (1) part3/4: pending: Add class specific iterators to `Instruction` and
>> clean up existing usages just as fo...
2020 Mar 10
2
RFC: Making a common successor/predecessor interface
...views.
>>>>
>>>> For some concrete view of what the changes look like, I uploaded two
>>>> preliminary patches:
>>>> (1) part 1: D75881 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75881>: Introducing
>>>> class specific iterators
>>>> (2) D75882 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75882>
>>>> (1) part 2: pending: Cleaning up existing usages; example replacement:
>>>> `succ_begin(BB)` with `BB->succ_begin()`.
>>>> (1) part3/4: pending: Add class specific iterators to `Instruction` and
>>>> cle...