Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "d7519778".
2015 Apr 20
3
[LLVMdev] Why are imm shifts where imm >= width type eliminated entirely?
Ok, this makes sense.
So, my follow up is then why, as in Mips, R600, etc... the bit value is
checked in the tablegen. Seems that we should expect it to fit anyways if
it still exists at this point?
I'm having a hard time trying to get shl to take a PatLeaf for Imm instead
of an ImmLeaf.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:11 PM, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>