Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d75086".
2020 Feb 27
2
Correct modelling of instructions with types smaller than the register class
Hi Quentin, Hi Amara,
I was following your discussion on D75086 regarding declaring types as
legal even if they are smaller than the actual register class (e.g. s16
and gpr32). We are working on a backend which only has 32 and 64-bit
registers and we recently had a problem regarding exactly this where we
had to declare G_UNMERGE_VALUES and G_MERGE_VALUES wi...
2020 Mar 02
2
Correct modelling of instructions with types smaller than the register class
...nik,
>
> I’ll do a brief reply here and if you want more information we can talk further :).
>
>> On Feb 27, 2020, at 5:40 AM, Dominik Montada <dominik.montada at hightec-rt.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Quentin, Hi Amara,
>>
>> I was following your discussion on D75086 regarding declaring types as legal even if they are smaller than the actual register class (e.g. s16 and gpr32). We are working on a backend which only has 32 and 64-bit registers and we recently had a problem regarding exactly this where we had to declare G_UNMERGE_VALUES and G_MERGE_VALUES with a...