search for: d74470

Hello, In regard to the review request https://reviews.llvm.org/D74470, I am trying to move five of the DIFlags to DISPFlag for the moment namely DIFlagExplicit, DIFlagPrototyped, DIFlagNoReturn, DIFlagThunk, DIFlagAllCallsDescribed. The llvm ir format for DISubprogram currently has backword compatibility where the isLocal, isDefinition, virtuality, isOptimized and SP...

...s.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [LLVM][DISubprogram][LL format updation query] Question regarding moving DISubprogram DIFlags to DISPFlag. Hi Chirag, On 20.2.20. 07:51, Chirag Patel via llvm-dev wrote: > Hello, > >   > > In regard to the review request https://reviews.llvm.org/D74470, > > I am trying to move five of the DIFlags to DISPFlag for the moment namely DIFlagExplicit, DIFlagPrototyped, DIFlagNoReturn, DIFlagThunk, DIFlagAllCallsDescribed. > > The llvm ir format for DISubprogram currently has backword compatibility where the isLocal, isDefinition, virtuali...

...VM][DISubprogram][LL format updation query] Question regarding moving DISubprogram DIFlags to DISPFlag. > > Hi Chirag, > > On 20.2.20. 07:51, Chirag Patel via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hello, >> >>   >> >> In regard to the review request https://reviews.llvm.org/D74470, >> >> I am trying to move five of the DIFlags to DISPFlag for the moment namely DIFlagExplicit, DIFlagPrototyped, DIFlagNoReturn, DIFlagThunk, DIFlagAllCallsDescribed. >> >> The llvm ir format for DISubprogram currently has backword compatibility where the isLocal, isDefini...