search for: d73911

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "d73911".

Did you mean: 373911
2020 Feb 18
4
Moving the AVR backend out of experimental
> > Should we just make it a normal target? > My only remaining reservation here - the generic DebugInfo tests, which presumably due to an unimplemented 16-bit branch somewhere deep in the llvm-objdump callstack. The AVR backend passes virtually all of the LLVM test suite but these when avr-unknown-unknown is set as the default target. It feels like the inclusion of ~80 XFAILs for these