Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d70157".
2020 Mar 24
3
Status of Intel JCC Mitigations and Next Steps
...h to branch alignment for the mitigation, but
also normal align directives.
The original patches proposed a somewhat different approach than we've
ended up taking - primarily because of memory overhead concerns.
However, there was also a deeper disagreement on the original review
threads (D70157 and others) which was never settled, and we seem to be
at a point where this needs attention. In short, the question is how
assembler support should be handled.
The Choice
The problematic use case comes when assembling user provided .s files.
(Instead of the more restricted output of the com...
2020 Mar 25
3
Status of Intel JCC Mitigations and Next Steps
...t for the mitigation, but also normal align
> directives.
>
> The original patches proposed a somewhat different approach than we've
> ended up taking - primarily because of memory overhead concerns. However,
> there was also a deeper disagreement on the original review threads (D70157
> and others) which was never settled, and we seem to be at a point where
> this needs attention. In short, the question is how assembler support
> should be handled.
>
>
>
> The Choice
>
> The problematic use case comes when assembling user provided .s files.
> (Inst...
2020 Mar 25
2
Status of Intel JCC Mitigations and Next Steps
...both to branch alignment for the mitigation, but also normal align directives.
The original patches proposed a somewhat different approach than we've ended up taking - primarily because of memory overhead concerns. However, there was also a deeper disagreement on the original review threads (D70157 and others) which was never settled, and we seem to be at a point where this needs attention. In short, the question is how assembler support should be handled.
The Choice
The problematic use case comes when assembling user provided .s files. (Instead of the more restricted output of the comp...