search for: d6a68731494f

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "d6a68731494f".

2020 Mar 05
2
Dovecot - spam training through Outlook
...ersion of MS Outlook. > I think I was confusing it with the last working version. 2010 didn't have the issue. 2013 has/had it. Here is the thread I bookmarked when trying to resolve this before giving up and shelving it: https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/8eafe714-8a8c-44bc-9228-d6a68731494f/outlook-2013-behavior-as-an-imap-client I think nothing has been fixed as Outlook still does APPEND. Regards, Claudius -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200305/7b6b8a00/attachment.html>
2020 Mar 05
0
Dovecot - spam training through Outlook
...t; >I think I was confusing it with the last working version. 2010 didn't >have the issue. 2013 has/had it. > >Here is the thread I bookmarked when trying to resolve this before >giving up and shelving it: >https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/8eafe714-8a8c-44bc-9228-d6a68731494f/outlook-2013-behavior-as-an-imap-client > >I think nothing has been fixed as Outlook still does APPEND. Again, these are obsoleted versions of MS Outlook. The latest official release is the 2019 version. I am actually using the beta version, but I doubt that it would make much difference. I...
2020 Mar 05
4
Dovecot - spam training through Outlook
I have given up on using any spam training with Outlook because Outlook seems rebuild the mails when you touch them. What it broke here: * Received Headers reshuffled and useless * x-mailer set to outlook There are multiple bug reports about this and MS seems to have fixed it once in Outlook 2010 but broke it again sometime later. I would be careful not to spam-report yourself with those mails
2015 Mar 10
2
Outlook 2013/2010 nightmare #2
Yes Eric, Outlook also has a declaration that as of either version 2010 or 2013, they no longer download IMAP headers, they download the whole message - thank God for faster Internet connections these days - could you imagine that in the older dialup days? Still it is a waste of bandwidth and disk space to do this. I am so tired of how they claim to use the RFC and indicate they are