Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d69ffd5b".
2016 Jul 29
0
Target Acceptance Policy
On 29 July 2016 at 12:09, Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote:
> What if a new back-end ticks all the right boxes but simply not being
> reviewed by established members of the community?
This case is clear. The code only goes in after proper review.
Interests vary from case to case, and normally, pinging on the mailing
list and on IRC is the only way to go. Waiting
2016 Jul 29
2
Target Acceptance Policy
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Matt Arsenault via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> +1, some sort of defined process is definitely needed. In particular I
> think there should be a guideline for when the backend has been reviewed
> "enough" before it can be committed.
>
IMHO, this is a very important point missed from the discussion so far.
What if a