search for: d68230

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:54 PM David Greene via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Renato Golin via Openmp-dev <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > But if we have some consensus on doing a clean job, then I would > > actually like to have that kind of intermediary check (diagnostics, > > warnings, etc) on most test-suite tests, which would

[ I am initially copying only a few lists since they seem like the most impacted projects and I didn't want to spam all the mailing lists. Please let me know if other lists should be included. ] I submitted D68230 for review but this is not about that patch per se. The patch allows update_cc_test_checks.py to process tests that should check target asm rather than LLVM IR. We use this facility downstream for our end-to-end tests. It strikes me that it might be useful for upstream to do similar end-to-end te...

Am Mi., 24. Juni 2020 um 10:12 Uhr schrieb David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > As mentioned in the Differential, generating the tests automatically > > will lose information about what actually is intended to be tested, > > Agreed - and I didn't mean to suggest tests should be automatically > generated. I work pretty hard in code reviews to encourage tests to

...-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> [ I am initially copying only a few lists since they seem like >> the most impacted projects and I didn't want to spam all the mailing >> lists. Please let me know if other lists should be included. ] >> >> I submitted D68230 for review but this is not about that patch per se. >> The patch allows update_cc_test_checks.py to process tests that should >> check target asm rather than LLVM IR. We use this facility downstream >> for our end-to-end tests. It strikes me that it might be useful for >>...