Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "d680e7ad".
2020 Mar 26
3
Re: [PATCH nbdkit 5/9 patch split 2/5] lib: Move code for parsing, passwords and paths into libnbdkit.so.
...>
> #include <unistd.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> #include <limits.h>
Intentional churn?
> diff --git a/server/test-public.c b/lib/test-public.c
> similarity index 99%
> rename from server/test-public.c
> rename to lib/test-public.c
> index fe347d44..d680e7ad 100644
> --- a/server/test-public.c
> +++ b/lib/test-public.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@
> #include <string.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
>
> -#include "internal.h"
> +#include "nbdkit-plugin.h"
> +#include "nbdkit-filter.h"
>
I...
2020 Mar 26
0
[PATCH nbdkit 5/9 patch split 2/5] lib: Move code for parsing, passwords and paths into libnbdkit.so.
...t = realpath (path, NULL);
+ if (ret == NULL) {
+ nbdkit_error ("realpath: %s: %m", path);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
diff --git a/server/test-public.c b/lib/test-public.c
similarity index 99%
rename from server/test-public.c
rename to lib/test-public.c
index fe347d44..d680e7ad 100644
--- a/server/test-public.c
+++ b/lib/test-public.c
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
-#include "internal.h"
+#include "nbdkit-plugin.h"
+#include "nbdkit-filter.h"
static bool error_flagged;
diff --git a/.gitignore b/...
2020 Mar 26
9
[PATCH nbdkit 5/9 patch split 1/5] Create libnbdkit.so.
This is the previous 5/9 patch posted earlier today, split into
reviewable chunks. This passes bisection with -x 'make && make
check', but I didn't work very hard on the commit messages, so I refer
you back to the original patch to explain how it works:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/msg00248.html
Rich.
2020 Mar 26
15
[PATCH nbdkit 0/9] Create libnbdkit.so
This creates libnbdkit.so as discussed in the following thread:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/thread.html#00203
test-delay-shutdown.sh fails for unclear reasons.
This series starts by reverting "tests: Don't strand hung nbdkit
processes" which is because several other tests fail randomly unless I
revert this patch. I didn't investigate this yet so it