Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d67410".
2019 Sep 10
2
Dwarf - 5 features in clang and llvm
...call-site-parameter (DW_TAG_call_site_parameter) and the debug entry values
> (DW_OP_entry_value) related DWARF 5 symbols, but it is restricted by the CC1 option ‘-femit-debug-entry-values’,
> since the LLDB is still missing support for that.
Not for too long ;)
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D67410 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67410> & https://reviews.llvm.org/D67376 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67376>
best,
vedant
>
> Best regards,
> Djordje
>
> On 10.9.19. 13:58, Sourabh Singh Tomar via llvm-dev wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I was working on so...
2019 Sep 10
2
Dwarf - 5 features in clang and llvm
Hello All,
I was working on some dwarf-5 features and debugging optimized code support
in clang and llvm.
Noticed that, DW_TAG_call_site is supported in llvm middle-end. but clang
is not emitting these.
I was hoping, if someone could provide current status of these features and
current status of dwarf-5 features in clang and llvm.
That will be immensely helpful.
Thanks!
Sourabh.
--------------
2019 Sep 11
3
Dwarf - 5 features in clang and llvm
...g entry values
> >> (DW_OP_entry_value) related DWARF 5 symbols, but it is restricted by
> the CC1 option ‘-femit-debug-entry-values’,
> >> since the LLDB is still missing support for that.
> >
> > Not for too long ;)
> >
> > See https://reviews.llvm.org/D67410 & https://reviews.llvm.org/D67376
> >
> > best,
> > vedant
> >
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Djordje
> >>
> >> On 10.9.19. 13:58, Sourabh Singh Tomar via llvm-dev wrote:
> >>> Hello All,
> >>>
> >&...