search for: d67167

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "d67167".

Did you mean: d67137
2020 Jun 01
2
Machinepipeliner interface. shouldIgnoreForPipelining, actually not ignoring.
Hi all, I think there is a mistake in the machinepipeliner interface. In the TargetInstrInfo.h in the class PipelinerLoopInfo there is a function "bool shouldIgnoreForPipelining(const MachineInstr *MI)". The description says that if this function returns true for a given MachineInstr it will not be pipelined. However in reality it is not ignored and is being considered for
2020 Sep 02
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: Machinepipeliner interface. shouldIgnoreForPipelining, actually not ignoring.
...ng. Hi Sander: It may be confusing, but it is not a bug. And you are right, if you are using the in-tree machinepipeliner, it won't have any effects, because there is NO In tree reference of this API at all. You can see the comments when James introduced this API in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67167 Best, Jinsong Ji (纪金松), PhD. XL/LLVM on Power Compiler Development E-mail: jji at us.ibm.com [Inactive hide details for Sander via llvm-dev ---06/02/2020 03:47:53 PM---Hi all, I think there is a mistake in the machinepipe]Sander via llvm-dev ---06/02/2020 03:47:53 PM---Hi all, I think there i...
2020 Sep 03
1
[EXTERNAL] RE: Machinepipeliner interface. shouldIgnoreForPipelining, actually not ignoring.
...onfusing, but it is not a bug. > And you are right, if you are using the in-tree machinepipeliner, it won't > have any effects, > because there is NO In tree reference of this API at all. > > You can see the comments when James introduced this API in > https://reviews.llvm.org/D67167 > > > > Best, > > Jinsong Ji (纪金松), PhD. > > XL/LLVM on Power Compiler Development > E-mail: jji at us.ibm.com > > [image: Inactive hide details for Sander via llvm-dev ---06/02/2020 > 03:47:53 PM---Hi all, I think there is a mistake in the machinepipe]Sander &gt...
2020 Sep 07
2
[EXTERNAL] RE: Machinepipeliner interface. shouldIgnoreForPipelining, actually not ignoring.
...onfusing, but it is not a bug. > And you are right, if you are using the in-tree machinepipeliner, it won't > have any effects, > because there is NO In tree reference of this API at all. > > You can see the comments when James introduced this API in > https://reviews.llvm.org/D67167 > > > > Best, > > Jinsong Ji (纪金松), PhD. > > XL/LLVM on Power Compiler Development > E-mail: jji at us.ibm.com > > [image: Inactive hide details for Sander via llvm-dev ---06/02/2020 > 03:47:53 PM---Hi all, I think there is a mistake in the machinepipe]Sander &gt...
2020 Sep 09
2
[EXTERNAL] RE: Machinepipeliner interface. shouldIgnoreForPipelining, actually not ignoring.
...onfusing, but it is not a bug. > And you are right, if you are using the in-tree machinepipeliner, it won't > have any effects, > because there is NO In tree reference of this API at all. > > You can see the comments when James introduced this API in > https://reviews.llvm.org/D67167 > > > > Best, > > Jinsong Ji (纪金松), PhD. > > XL/LLVM on Power Compiler Development > E-mail: jji at us.ibm.com > > *Error! Filename not specified.*Sander via llvm-dev ---06/02/2020 > 03:47:53 PM---Hi all, I think there is a mistake in the machinepipeliner > in...