search for: d6584

On 18 December 2014 at 21:32, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: > I think this will help one facet of your problem: > http://reviews.llvm.org/D6584 I don't think so, because the tests don't time out, it's a buffering issue... --renato

Folks, Some of our CMake buildbots are failing to timeout, and I believe it's something to do with how the output comes from the LIT tests, even though we add -v to LIT_ARGS. When the "check-all" stage runs, the output stops at the "Running tests" message and only prints the rest of the output (including all tests that pass, fail, etc) at the end. I believe this has to

Hi, > Cool, I hope this succeeds. I tried implementing per-test timeouts before, and couldn't get it to work in all cases. The review eventually fizzled out, and I abandoned it. > > Here's that old review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6584 Perhaps you can cannibalize testcases from it. Thanks for that. I'll take a look. > >> >> I'm e-mailing llvm-dev rather than llvm-commits >> because I want to gather more feedback on my initial implementation and >> hopefully some answers to some unresolved issue...

...[LLVMdev] LIT Verbose > > > > On 12/18/14 2:35 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > > On 18 December 2014 at 21:32, Jonathan Roelofs > > <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: > >> I think this will help one facet of your problem: > >> http://reviews.llvm.org/D6584 > > > > I don't think so, because the tests don't time out, it's a buffering issue... > > I gather that the tests don't time out, but you want them to because they're > taking to long, and whatever you're currently using to do that doesn't work. &gt...

Hi, A feature I've wanted in lit for a while is a having a timeout per test. Attached are patches that implement this idea. I'm e-mailing llvm-dev rather than llvm-commits because I want to gather more feedback on my initial implementation and hopefully some answers to some unresolved issues with my implementation. Currently in lit you can set a global timeout for all of the tests but