Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d657fdff".
2004 Sep 17
0
[LLVMdev] Inline Assembly (unique arch string for llvm)
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Andrew Lenharth wrote:
> So I propose that llvm-gcc not consider itself any type of x86-linux (or
> what ever it platform it was compiled on), but rather create a new
> architecture, say llvm (or perhaps 2, one for each bit and little
> endian). Thuse llvm-gcc -dumpmachine would return llvm-os.
Hrm, I would much rather just have LLVM be a drop in replacement for
2004 Sep 17
2
[LLVMdev] Inline Assembly (unique arch string for llvm)
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 11:40, John Criswell wrote:
> My impression is that inline assembly bites us a lot not because it's
> used a lot but because the LLVM compiler enables #defines for the i386
> platform that we don't support.
>
> I think a lot of code has the following:
>
> #ifdef _i386
> inline asm
> #else
> slow C code
> #endif
>
> The LLVM
2004 Sep 17
2
[LLVMdev] Inline Assembly (unique arch string for llvm)
...bytecode be endian agnostic.
Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040917/d657fdff/attachment.sig>