search for: d649e578

We considered that early on, but most object files actually end up in .lib files so unless there were a way to connect the objects in the .lib to the corresponding .ghash files, this would disable ghash usage for a large amount of inputs. Supporting both is an option, but it adds a bit of complexity and I’m not totally convinced it’s worth it On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:38 AM Leonardo Santagada

it does. I just had an epiphany: why not just write a .ghash file and have lld read those if they exist for an .obj file? Seem much simpler than trying to wire up a 20 year old file format. I will try to do this, is something like this acceptable for LLD? The cool thing is that I can generate .ghash for .lib or any obj lying around (maybe even for pdb in the future). On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at

...onardo Santagada >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Leonardo Santagada >> > -- Leonardo Santagada -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180126/d649e578/attachment.html>