search for: d57525

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 21:05, JF Bastien via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The patch is about ready to land, which means any older compiler will soft-error (which you can turn off with LLVM_TEMPORARILY_ALLOW_OLD_TOOLCHAIN). I think we should then cherry-pick the patch to the LLVM 8 branch. > > The last remaining issue are the buildbots. I audited *all* bots in

...s do this, so we can ensure an old >> compiler + LLVM_TEMPORARILY_ALLOW_OLD_TOOLCHAIN build actually remains >> functional up until the point support for the old compiler is actually >> removed. > > Reid asked me to do so for sanitizer-windows: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D57525 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57525> > > Ideally yes we’d have bots covering all eventualities, but this is but one of many holes in our coverage. On the upside, that hole is disappearing in a few months :) > > >> Best, >> >> Alex > > ____________________...

...st some bots do this, so we can ensure an old > compiler + LLVM_TEMPORARILY_ALLOW_OLD_TOOLCHAIN build actually remains > functional up until the point support for the old compiler is actually > removed. > > Reid asked me to do so for sanitizer-windows: > https://reviews.llvm.org/D57525 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57525> > > Ideally yes we’d have bots covering all eventualities, but this is but one of many holes in our coverage. On the upside, that hole is disappearing in a few months :) > > > > Best, > > Alex > > ________________________...