Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d56690".
Did you mean:
56690
2019 Jan 15
4
RFC: Removal of Nios2 backend
...evs who contributed significantly or might
have specific opinions about this?
Does it make more sense to this before or after the branch?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:25 PM Craig Topper via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Patches up
>
> Clang: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56690
> LLVM: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56691
>
> ~Craig
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:51 PM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> We (Intel) would like to propose removal of the Nios2 backend from the
>> repository.
>>
>> It is cur...
2019 Jan 15
2
RFC: Removal of Nios2 backend
...s?
>>
>> Does it make more sense to this before or after the branch?
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:25 PM Craig Topper via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Patches up
>>>
>>> Clang: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56690
>>> LLVM: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56691
>>>
>>> ~Craig
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:51 PM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We (Intel) would like to propose removal of the...
2019 Jan 14
2
RFC: Removal of Nios2 backend
We (Intel) would like to propose removal of the Nios2 backend from the
repository.
It is currently considered an experimental target. The implementation is
not complete and months went by without anyone noticing it doesn't build.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D56178
Due to internal priority changes, it doesn't look like it will become more
maintained in the near future. So I would like to