Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d56567".
Did you mean:
d56569
2019 Jan 10
2
Removing LLVM_ALWAYS_INLINE from ADT classes
...gRef("l"))
> (bool) $4 = true
> (lldb) p ToolName.consume_front(llvm::StringRef("a"))
> (bool) $5 = false
> (lldb) p ToolName.slice(1,2)
> (llvm::StringRef) $3 = (Data = "ldb", Length = 1)
>
> Thank you!
New review online: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56567
--
Davide
"There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more
or less solved" -- Henri Poincare
2019 Jan 09
2
Removing LLVM_ALWAYS_INLINE from ADT classes
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 9:38 AM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 3:15 PM Davide Italiano via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I would like to propose, based on a previous discussion on llvm-dev,
>> the following change.
>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D56337
>>
>> The