search for: d56178

We (Intel) would like to propose removal of the Nios2 backend from the repository. It is currently considered an experimental target. The implementation is not complete and months went by without anyone noticing it doesn't build. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D56178 Due to internal priority changes, it doesn't look like it will become more maintained in the near future. So I would like to propose removing it from the repository. I will put together a patch for review shortly. ~Craig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

...l) would like to propose removal of the Nios2 backend from the >> repository. >> >> It is currently considered an experimental target. The implementation is >> not complete and months went by without anyone noticing it doesn't build. >> See https://reviews.llvm.org/D56178 >> >> Due to internal priority changes, it doesn't look like it will become >> more maintained in the near future. So I would like to propose removing it >> from the repository. >> >> I will put together a patch for review shortly. >> >> ~Craig &g...

...Nios2 backend from the >>>> repository. >>>> >>>> It is currently considered an experimental target. The implementation >>>> is not complete and months went by without anyone noticing it doesn't >>>> build. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D56178 >>>> >>>> Due to internal priority changes, it doesn't look like it will become >>>> more maintained in the near future. So I would like to propose removing it >>>> from the repository. >>>> >>>> I will put together a patch...