search for: d54043

...velopers. There are Differentials posted for Fortran debug handling in LLVM and the last update on them was Nov. 28. As far as I can tell the status on them is: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54327 - Looks ready to land, awaiting approval from someone. Who is the someone? https://reviews.llvm.org/D54043 - Paul Robinson did some groundwork to aid the effort. No updates since. https://reviews.llvm.org/D54114 - No updates since Nov. 6. Some questions awaiting response. I know from personal experience how difficult it is to get big changes approved, so I don't fault the f18 team for the le...

Regarding flags, I was just thinking that maybe we should invent a new DISubprogramFlags type. DISubprogram already has a few bitfields for subprogram-specific things, Fortran will want 3 more, and there's no reason to fill up the generic DIFlags with more bits that are used in only one class. I agree that the array stuff needs to be designed with an eye to handling how other languages do

Following up on my earlier email. If there is a commitment to checking in f18 already, feel free to disregard it. I went and took a little bit closer look at the sources and want to share some of the findings in case if anyone is interested. Disclosure: I contribute to Fort <http://fort-compiler.org/> (fort-compiler.org), which is the fork of the front-end David Greene mentioned. From