Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "d51489".
Did you mean:
51489
2018 Sep 13
2
[GlobalISel][MIPS] Legality and instruction combining
..., s8 and s16 should be widened to s32)?
b) Is the plan to sometimes let s1 as legal type and ignore it later?
c) Is the plan to sometimes let s1 as legal type and use this type as a hint to select between multiple available instructions using some patterns?
For example, in https://reviews.llvm.org/D51489, G_ICMP got its result (type0) legalized as legal for s32 (corresponding to plan a)). We would get similar final output (also correct) if we said that type0 is legal for s1 (corresponding to b), but in this case it is also necessary to: tell that extends are legal for {s32, s1}, regbankselct and in...