search for: d4d044f0

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d4d044f0".

[LLVMdev] _Znwm is not a builtin
2013 May 16
0
[LLVMdev] _Znwm is not a builtin
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > >> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> LLVM classifies _Znwm as a builtin by default. After some
[LLVMdev] _Znwm is not a builtin
2013 May 16
5
[LLVMdev] _Znwm is not a builtin
...ttribute on a call site (as opposed to on the function itself). What specific kinds of optimizations are we interested in doing to _Znwm calls? -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130515/d4d044f0/attachment.html>
[LLVMdev] _Znwm is not a builtin
2013 May 16
4
[LLVMdev] _Znwm is not a builtin
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> LLVM classifies _Znwm as a builtin by default. After some discussion, the >> C++ core working group have decreed that that is not correct: calls to >> "operator