Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "d4961".
Did you mean:
4961
2014 Aug 18
2
[LLVMdev] Plan to optimize atomics in LLVM
Hi Robin,
On 15 August 2014 21:49, Robin Morisset <morisset at google.com> wrote:
> I have
> attached the corresponding patches; they are not completely ready for review
> (mostly missing tests), I would just like to make sure that the general
> approach seems reasonable.
I've had a quick glance at the patches, and the code seems fairly sane.
But I'm not so sure about