search for: d49084

...rt matching arithmetic expressions involving variable [1] (eg. to match REG+1 where REG is a variable with a numeric value). It was suggested to me in the review to introduce the concept of numeric variable and to allow for specifying the base the value are written in. [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D49084 I think the syntax should satisfy the below requirements: * based off the [[]] construct since anything else might overload an existing valid syntax (eg. $$ is supposed to match literally now) * consistent with syntax for expressions using @LINE * consistent with using ':' to define regul...

...variable [1] (eg. to match REG+1 >> where REG is a variable with a numeric value). It was suggested to me >> in the review to introduce the concept of numeric variable and to >> allow for specifying the base the value are written in. >> >> [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D49084 >> >> I think the syntax should satisfy the below requirements: >> >> * based off the [[]] construct since anything else might overload an >> existing valid syntax (eg. $$ is supposed to match literally now) >> * consistent with syntax for expressions using @LINE...

...t; where REG is a variable with a numeric value). It was suggested to me > > >> in the review to introduce the concept of numeric variable and to > > >> allow for specifying the base the value are written in. > > >> > > >> [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D49084 > > >> > > >> I think the syntax should satisfy the below requirements: > > >> > > >> * based off the [[]] construct since anything else might overload an > > >> existing valid syntax (eg. $$ is supposed to match literally now) > > &...

...meric value). It was suggested to me >> > > >> in the review to introduce the concept of numeric variable and to >> > > >> allow for specifying the base the value are written in. >> > > >> >> > > >> [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D49084 >> > > >> >> > > >> I think the syntax should satisfy the below requirements: >> > > >> >> > > >> * based off the [[]] construct since anything else might overload an >> > > >> existing valid syntax (eg. $$ is...

...>> >> > > >> in the review to introduce the concept of numeric variable and to >> >> > > >> allow for specifying the base the value are written in. >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D49084 >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> I think the syntax should satisfy the below requirements: >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> * based off the [[]] construct since anything else might overload an >> >> > &...

...; >> in the review to introduce the concept of numeric variable and to >> >> >> > > >> allow for specifying the base the value are written in. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D49084 >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> I think the syntax should satisfy the below requirements: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> * based off the [[]] construct since anything else might...

...; >> in the review to introduce the concept of numeric variable and to >> >> >> > > >> allow for specifying the base the value are written in. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D49084 >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> I think the syntax should satisfy the below requirements: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> * based off the [[]] construct since anything else might...

...e the concept of numeric >> variable and to >> >> >> >> > > >> allow for specifying the base the value are written in. >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D49084 >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> I think the syntax should satisfy the below requirements: >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> * based off the [[]]...