search for: d48e7be9bb49

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "d48e7be9bb49".

2020 Feb 11
0
[PATCH 35/62] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler
...clude/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h index 6f61bb93366a..d48e7be9bb49 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int __init early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size); void __init mem_encrypt_init(void); void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void); +void __init encrypted...
2020 Feb 11
1
[PATCH 35/62] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler
...++ > arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h > index 6f61bb93366a..d48e7be9bb49 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h > @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int __init early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size); > void __init mem_encrypt_init(void); > void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void);...
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi, here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete, but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.