Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "d48e7be9bb49".
2020 Feb 11
0
[PATCH 35/62] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler
...clude/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
index 6f61bb93366a..d48e7be9bb49 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int __init early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size);
void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void);
+void __init encrypted...
2020 Feb 11
1
[PATCH 35/62] x86/sev-es: Setup per-cpu GHCBs for the runtime handler
...++
> arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> index 6f61bb93366a..d48e7be9bb49 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int __init early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size);
> void __init mem_encrypt_init(void);
> void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void);...
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi,
here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run
under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete,
but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the
size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial
feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code
here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi,
here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run
under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete,
but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the
size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial
feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code
here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.