search for: d47610

...information (ISA ). It looks like better to legalize or generate them later. regards, Venkat. On 30 June 2018 at 04:04, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > wrote: > Hi Hideki - > > I hinted at this problem in the summary text of https://reviews.llvm.org/ > D47610: > Why are we transforming from LLVM intrinsics to platform-specific > intrinsics in IR? I don't see the benefit. > > I don't know if it solves all of the problems you're seeing, but it should > be a small change to transform to the platform-specific SVML or other > in...

Ashutosh, Thanks for the repy. Related earlier topic on this appears in the review of the SVML patch (@mmasten). Adding few names from there. https://reviews.llvm.org/D19544 There, I see Hal's review comment "let's start only with the directly-legal calls". Apparently, what we have right now in the trunk is "not legal enough". I'll work on the patch to stop

...r. > > > > regards, > > Venkat. > > > > > > On 30 June 2018 at 04:04, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Hideki - > > > > I hinted at this problem in the summary text of > https://reviews.llvm.org/D47610: > > Why are we transforming from LLVM intrinsics to platform-specific > intrinsics in IR? I don't see the benefit. > > > > I don't know if it solves all of the problems you're seeing, but it should > be a small change to transform to the platform-specific SVML o...

...On 30 June 2018 at 04:04, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Hi Hideki - > >   > > I hinted at this problem in the summary text of > https://reviews.llvm.org/D47610: > > Why are we transforming from LLVM intrinsics to > platform-specific intrinsics in IR? I don't see the benefit. > >   > > I don't know if it solves all of the problems you're seeing, > but it should be a small change to...