search for: d47097

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d47097".

Did you mean: 47097
2018 May 31
1
[SROA][DebugInfo][GSoC] Testing SROA on amalgamated sqlite source
...r good reasons or does it look more like an oversight in the implementation? How can I approach this? My guess is that all these phi's are with line 0 because they are made of stores and allocas that aren't actual code, and are instead generated by clang. Like here https://reviews.llvm.org/D47097 at test1
2018 May 30
0
[SROA][DebugInfo][GSoC] Testing SROA on amalgamated sqlite source
> On May 30, 2018, at 8:37 AM, Anast Gramm <anastasis.gramm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Introduction > ============ > > `SROA' is an early stage pass running at the very beginning of the > pipeline in `-O{1,2,3}'. Greg Bedwell's report from his DExTer tool > shows SROA on function as one of the major culprits of Debug Info > loss. > > With
2018 May 30
4
[SROA][DebugInfo][GSoC] Testing SROA on amalgamated sqlite source
Introduction ============ `SROA' is an early stage pass running at the very beginning of the pipeline in `-O{1,2,3}'. Greg Bedwell's report from his DExTer tool shows SROA on function as one of the major culprits of Debug Info loss. With debugify-each partially done I tried testing this on the amalgamated sqlite source. The steps are as follows: ,---- | # generate