Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d466226b".
2008 Dec 28
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
>> ...snip...
>
> Also for a note of reference, your links to the examples are the
> most advanced samples. So boost can do more, thus has more weight/
> bloat behind it.
>
> Were the other test kits looked at? Is gtest the best solution for
> the project.
>
> Is this something your planning as putting in the tree, thus require
> pulling in changes from
2008 Dec 28
3
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Misha Brukman wrote:
>
> 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com>
>
>> Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or
>> a different test suite?
>> I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar with