search for: d46054

Hi Simon, that makes sense to me. Please add me on any reviews when you're done. Cheers, Nicolai On 23.04.2018 14:08, Simon Tatham via llvm-dev wrote: > Hello llvm-dev, > > Would there be any interest in adding a back end to TableGen to produce output in a general-purpose but machine-parsable format? > > At the moment, TableGen has two kinds of output option. The -gen-foo

...). ## On the mailing lists * Simon Tatham is interested in contributing a [JSON backend for TableGen](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-April/122723.html), providing a machine-readable alternative to -print-records. An initial patch is already [up for review](https://reviews.llvm.org/D46054). * Following on from his lightning talk at EuroLLVM, Kristof Beyls has shared a [script for matching up open Phabricator reviews to potential reviewers](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-April/122817.html) and is seeking feedback. * The Google Summer of Code community bonding period...

Hello llvm-dev, Would there be any interest in adding a back end to TableGen to produce output in a general-purpose but machine-parsable format? At the moment, TableGen has two kinds of output option. The -gen-foo options are each tailored to a particular use case; the -print-records option is fully general, but it's difficult to machine-parse, since its output is in the same syntax as the