search for: d44236

...behaviours that we have chosen not to support whilst doing this. I guess the obvious question from me is do we need the same drop-in replacement for COFF support? Also, Jake has just posted up a fairly major refactor of the existing command-line interface on Phabricator: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44236 I don't know how your proposal would interact with this, but if the approach we're looking at taking looks like this would just make life harder, please shout! James On 7 March 2018 at 20:34, Saleem Abdulrasool via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Ma...

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:56 AM Eric Christopher via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Zach! > > I've been thinking a bit about this for a while now and I'm still of two > opinions: > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 9:21 AM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Currently llvm-objcopy only supports ELF

...ot to support whilst doing > this. I guess the obvious question from me is do we need the same drop-in > replacement for COFF support? > > Also, Jake has just posted up a fairly major refactor of the existing > command-line interface on Phabricator: > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D44236 > > I don't know how your proposal would interact with this, but if the > approach we're looking at taking looks like this would just make life > harder, please shout! > > James > > On 7 March 2018 at 20:34, Saleem Abdulrasool via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists...