search for: d44053

Hi, I think we should remove the LoopInstSimplify pass, as it has no test coverage and no users (afaik). If you are using the pass, or think that it should stay in tree for some other reason, please let me know. Here's the patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44053 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D44053> vedant -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180302/d24bc360/attachment.html>

...i, > > I think we should remove the LoopInstSimplify pass, as it has no test > coverage and no users (afaik). > > If you are using the pass, or think that it should stay in tree for > some other reason, please let me know. > > Here's the patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44053 > > vedant > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://...

...t;> I think we should remove the LoopInstSimplify pass, as it has no test coverage and no users (afaik). >> >> If you are using the pass, or think that it should stay in tree for some other reason, please let me know. >> >> Here's the patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44053 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D44053> >> >> vedant >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m...

...stSimplify pass, as it has no >>> test coverage and no users (afaik). >>> >>> If you are using the pass, or think that it should stay in tree for >>> some other reason, please let me know. >>> >>> Here's the patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44053 >>> >>> vedant >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> > -------------...