search for: d42998

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d42998".

2018 Feb 07
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
The patch is up for review here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42998 On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:58 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Also, could you patch and test Clang with the Linux kernel after I make > this change? I'd like to know that we actually successfully call the > correct thunks and that they behave correctly. I...
2018 Feb 07
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
Also, could you patch and test Clang with the Linux kernel after I make this change? I'd like to know that we actually successfully call the correct thunks and that they behave correctly. I'm not super worried, but good to actually get this right. I'm am slightly more worried about the stack-based retpoline than the register ones just due to the overall lower amount of testing
2018 Feb 07
6
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...patch works well with the Linux kernel. David, if you're up for that, it would be great. Alternatively, Guenter or someone else here can help. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:59 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > The patch is up for review here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42998 > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:58 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > wrote: > >> Also, could you patch and test Clang with the Linux kernel after I make >> this change? I'd like to know that we actually successfully call the >> correct thunks and t...