Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "d41420".
2018 Jan 05
2
RFC: [LV] any objections in moving isLegalMasked* check from Legal to CostModel? (Cleaning up LoopVectorizationLegality)
...at it has better conformance to VPlan vision going forward
(http://www.llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VectorizationPlan.html). All VP*Recipe class definitions are now
moved to VPlan.h, and I have a patch under review to move LoopVectorizationPlanner class out of
LoopVectorize.cpp (https://reviews.llvm.org/D41420).
Next thing I'm working on is LoopVectorizationLegality, and I noticed that it has a component of
CostModel and optimization, which doesn't seem right from vectorizer's architectural perspective.
It appears that we are currently abusing Legal as the attic to throw a lot of things in o...
2018 Jan 05
0
RFC: [LV] any objections in moving isLegalMasked* check from Legal to CostModel? (Cleaning up LoopVectorizationLegality)
...r conformance to VPlan vision going forward
> (http://www.llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VectorizationPlan.html). All VP*Recipe class definitions are now
> moved to VPlan.h, and I have a patch under review to move LoopVectorizationPlanner class out of
> LoopVectorize.cpp (https://reviews.llvm.org/D41420).
>
> Next thing I'm working on is LoopVectorizationLegality, and I noticed that it has a component of
> CostModel and optimization, which doesn't seem right from vectorizer's architectural perspective.
> It appears that we are currently abusing Legal as the attic to throw...
2018 Jan 06
2
RFC: [LV] any objections in moving isLegalMasked* check from Legal to CostModel? (Cleaning up LoopVectorizationLegality)
...> conformance to VPlan vision going forward
> (http://www.llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VectorizationPlan.html). All
> VP*Recipe class definitions are now moved to VPlan.h, and I have a patch under review to move LoopVectorizationPlanner class out of LoopVectorize.cpp (https://reviews.llvm.org/D41420).
>
> Next thing I'm working on is LoopVectorizationLegality, and I noticed
> that it has a component of CostModel and optimization, which doesn't seem right from vectorizer's architectural perspective.
> It appears that we are currently abusing Legal as the attic to throw...
2018 Jan 07
0
RFC: [LV] any objections in moving isLegalMasked* check from Legal to CostModel? (Cleaning up LoopVectorizationLegality)
...onformance to VPlan vision going forward
>> (http://www.llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VectorizationPlan.html). All
>> VP*Recipe class definitions are now moved to VPlan.h, and I have a patch under review to move LoopVectorizationPlanner class out of LoopVectorize.cpp (https://reviews.llvm.org/D41420).
>>
>> Next thing I'm working on is LoopVectorizationLegality, and I noticed
>> that it has a component of CostModel and optimization, which doesn't seem right from vectorizer's architectural perspective.
>> It appears that we are currently abusing Legal as the...
2018 Jan 09
1
RFC: [LV] any objections in moving isLegalMasked* check from Legal to CostModel? (Cleaning up LoopVectorizationLegality)
...formance to VPlan vision going forward
>> (http://www.llvm.org/docs/Proposals/VectorizationPlan.html). All
>> VP*Recipe class definitions are now moved to VPlan.h, and I have a patch under review to move LoopVectorizationPlanner class out of LoopVectorize.cpp (https://reviews.llvm.org/D41420).
>>
>> Next thing I'm working on is LoopVectorizationLegality, and I noticed
>> that it has a component of CostModel and optimization, which doesn't seem right from vectorizer's architectural perspective.
>> It appears that we are currently abusing Legal as the...