Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d40950".
Did you mean:
40950
2017 Dec 07
4
[RFC] - Deduplication of debug information in linkers (LLD).
...ust implement that future better thing)
I see. Basing on all comments in this thread I am inclined to agree that implementing newer thing does not make much sence atm.
For now I prepared patch to error out when LLD faces objects with multiple .debug_* sections for cases when we do not support it.
(D40950). (In LLD we are supporting deduplicating COMDATs, so generally such object is not a problem as already supported,
but for error reporting purposes and for --gdb-index we assume debug sections are unique in object,
so in that case we looks want to error out).
Have last thoughts/question about thi...
2017 Dec 06
4
[RFC] - Deduplication of debug information in linkers (LLD).
>If you're interested in things you can do in the linker for this - you might consider something more aggressive: Fully DWARF aware deduplication.
>
>This could be done hopefully by reusing some of the code in the dsymutil implementation in LLVM.
>
>This would be much more effective (and without the possible context-sensitive tradeoffs) than using type units.
>Though