Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d4043471".
Did you mean:
2404371
2012 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] llvm::Type as llvm::Value in metadata
...())
of the respective type.
Cheers,
Clemens
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6392 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120327/d4043471/attachment.bin>
2012 Mar 26
4
[LLVMdev] llvm::Type as llvm::Value in metadata
Hi all,
I've a question about something that's bothering me for quite some time now: why is a llvm::Function seen as a llvm::Value (in a sense that llvm::Function is a subclass of llvm::Value), but llvm::Type is not? Should they not - technically seen - be equal?
And to ask a concrete question: is there any way to store a reference to a llvm::Type within the LLVM metadata? As far as I