search for: d4043471

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d4043471".

Did you mean: 2404371
2012 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] llvm::Type as llvm::Value in metadata
...()) of the respective type. Cheers, Clemens -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 6392 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120327/d4043471/attachment.bin>
2012 Mar 26
4
[LLVMdev] llvm::Type as llvm::Value in metadata
Hi all, I've a question about something that's bothering me for quite some time now: why is a llvm::Function seen as a llvm::Value (in a sense that llvm::Function is a subclass of llvm::Value), but llvm::Type is not? Should they not - technically seen - be equal? And to ask a concrete question: is there any way to store a reference to a llvm::Type within the LLVM metadata? As far as I