search for: d40366

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d40366".

Did you mean: 140366
2018 Feb 15
0
[RFC] [lld] Replace use of 'concurrency::parallel_for_each' with standard library
Thank you so much for tracking down such a tricky issue. I agree that we should disable it. Should we just delete the ifdefs? We could in theory disable it just for debug builds, but that could create some hard to reproduce bugs. Cheers, Rafael Owen Reynolds via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Hello all, > > Last year I submitted a bug regarding the use of
2018 Feb 15
3
[RFC] [lld] Replace use of 'concurrency::parallel_for_each' with standard library
Hello all, Last year I submitted a bug regarding the use of 'parallel_for_each' and Windows Concurrency Library. We have found that when compiling in Visual Studio 2015 and 2017 with /MTd, the use of 'concurrency::parallel_for_each' can cause unhandled exceptions when the program is exiting. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34976 After having some difficulty clarifying this