Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "d3867cf7".
Did you mean:
d38637c7
2013 Jan 04
0
[LLVMdev] Compiler opt is turned off ?
I'm not sure what you mean by "use" check.
If you compile this with LTO and multiple modules, and guarantee that
you have the main function, yes, you could optimize this.
In all other cases, it's not possible to eliminate any of the
remaining loads or stores you see, because you have no guarantee about
what else could read it.
Heck, a conforming implementation of printf could
2013 Jan 04
2
[LLVMdev] Compiler opt is turned off ?
Thanks for your reply. So, we don't do any "use" check (for globals
variables) beyond a module scope. If so, it answers my question.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Justin Holewinski <
justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
> Since a, b, and c are globals, how does the optimize *know* they are not
> used elsewhere (e.g. another module)?
>
-------------- next part
2013 Jan 05
1
[LLVMdev] Compiler opt is turned off ?
...mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130105/d3867cf7/attachment.html>