Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d38489".
Did you mean:
d38481
2017 Oct 03
2
TargetMachine vs LLVMTargetMachine
The distinction between the LLVMTargetMachine and TargetMachine classes has become somewhat muddy recently. So I created:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38482
to clean things up. During review it was noted that we may rather merge the two instead which looks like this:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489>
We really should choose one of the two over the status quo. Some points for the discussion:
- I am not aware of any target that is actually implementing TargetMachine only but not LLVMTargetMachine (I assume the C backend used to do it before it was removed...
2017 Oct 03
2
TargetMachine vs LLVMTargetMachine
...VMTargetMachine and TargetMachine classes
> has become somewhat muddy recently. So I created:
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D38482
>
> to clean things up. During review it was noted that we may rather merge
> the two instead which looks like this:
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489
>
> We really should choose one of the two over the status quo. Some points
> for the discussion:
>
> - I am not aware of any target that is actually implementing TargetMachine
> only but not LLVMTargetMachine (I assume the C backend used to do it before
> it was removed)
>...