search for: d36357

...patch by Peter Penzin. * "This adds a better error diagnostic when deleting the evaluation of a lambda expression. The [] of a lambda binds more closely to the delete, so this error suggests adding parentheses, instead of the generic one currently used ('expected expression')." [D36357](https://reviews.llvm.org/D36357), patch by Nicolas Lesser. * "Clarify Clang warnings about undefined behaviour for bitshifts. It happens that the current output mislead users and makes them think that Clang is wrong." [D30295](https://reviews.llvm.org/D30295), patch by Daniel Marjamäki....

On 27 August 2017 at 00:01, Alex Bradbury <asb at asbradbury.org> wrote: > Hi all. I'm assuming most people reading this email are familiar with LLVM's > code review process <http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#code-reviews> > as well as LLVM Weekly, the development newsletter I've written and sent out > every Monday since Jan 2014. Since that time,

Hi all. I'm assuming most people reading this email are familiar with LLVM's code review process <http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#code-reviews> as well as LLVM Weekly, the development newsletter I've written and sent out every Monday since Jan 2014. Since that time, it's provided something of a "signal boost" for important mailing list discussions and