search for: d3240

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "d3240".

Did you mean: 3240
2014 Apr 01
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal: Add a guaranteed tail call marker
...a ret which uses the bitcast. Importantly, LLVM must perform TCO regardless of the computation necessary to compute the arguments for the callee, which is not the case today. I sent a patch to llvm-commits, but I'd like to hear high-level feedback on llvmdev: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3240 Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140331/71db259e/attachment.html>
2014 Apr 04
2
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Simple control-flow integrity
...easonable to require the code generator to emit the body of a function containing only a 'musttail' function call as a single branch instruction. Then you could emit such functions in the jump table section. Reid, what do you think? Thanks, -- Peter [1] http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3240
2014 Apr 04
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Simple control-flow integrity
...sttail' > > function call as a single branch instruction. Then you could emit such > > functions in the jump table section. > > > > Reid, what do you think? > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Peter > > > > [1] http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3240 > > -- Peter
2014 Mar 21
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Simple control-flow integrity
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:54:07PM -0700, Tom Roeder wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > >> The way I've implemented it (see the patch I sent to llvm-commits > >> yesterday), it's not just metadata: the intrinsic lowers to the > >> jumptable entry code given above. The CFI pass then generates a