search for: d28177

...ys to make this working but we (see [4], comment 7 and 8) think the gain in precision is not worth the complexity (and what's here is *much much* better than what's in the tree as it tries at least to be correct). #### Plan for integration The patch is available at https://reviews.llvm.org/D28177 Any comments/feedback/testing is definitely welcome. This is a self-contained change. #### (Possible) future work If this goes in I'd like to implement constant propagation for missing IR constructs (in particular vectors), and make sure SCCP is on par with the other two costant propagation pa...

...but we (see [4], comment 7 and 8) think the gain in > precision is not worth the complexity (and what's here is *much much* > better than what's in the tree as it tries at least to be correct). > > #### Plan for integration > The patch is available at https://reviews.llvm.org/D28177 > Any comments/feedback/testing is definitely welcome. This is a > self-contained change. > > #### (Possible) future work > If this goes in I'd like to implement constant propagation for missing > IR constructs (in particular vectors), and make sure SCCP is on par > with th...

...but we (see [4], comment 7 and 8) think the gain in > precision is not worth the complexity (and what's here is *much much* > better than what's in the tree as it tries at least to be correct). > > #### Plan for integration > The patch is available at https://reviews.llvm.org/D28177 > Any comments/feedback/testing is definitely welcome. This is a > self-contained change. > > #### (Possible) future work > If this goes in I'd like to implement constant propagation for missing > IR constructs (in particular vectors), and make sure SCCP is on par > with th...

...7 and 8) think the gain in > > precision is not worth the complexity (and what's here is *much much* > > better than what's in the tree as it tries at least to be correct). > > > > #### Plan for integration > > The patch is available at https://reviews.llvm.org/D28177 > > Any comments/feedback/testing is definitely welcome. This is a > > self-contained change. > > > > #### (Possible) future work > > If this goes in I'd like to implement constant propagation for missing > > IR constructs (in particular vectors), and make su...

...ain in >> > precision is not worth the complexity (and what's here is *much much* >> > better than what's in the tree as it tries at least to be correct). >> > >> > #### Plan for integration >> > The patch is available at https://reviews.llvm.org/D28177 >> > Any comments/feedback/testing is definitely welcome. This is a >> > self-contained change. >> > >> > #### (Possible) future work >> > If this goes in I'd like to implement constant propagation for missing >> > IR constructs (in particul...