search for: d2700

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "d2700".

Did you mean: 2700
2013 Apr 03
1
[LLVMdev] Debugging atom builds?
Hi LLVM Dev, One of my recent commits has broken build on Ubuntu Atom D2700. 2013/4/3 <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org>: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder clang-atom-d2700-ubuntu-rel while building llvm. > Full details are available at: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-atom-d2700-ubuntu-rel/builds/7852 > > Buildbot URL:...
2012 Jul 02
14
HP Proliant DL360 G7
Hello, Has anyone out there been able to qualify the Proliant DL360 G7 for your Solaris/OI/Nexenta environments? Any pros/cons/gotchas (vs. previous generation HP servers) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! -Anh
2013 Oct 23
1
[LLVMdev] Buildslave atom1-buildbot
Hi Brian, The Atom1-buildbot buildslave has been failing for a few days but I don't think the problem lies in the LLVM/Clang source. From the logs at http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-atom-d2700-ubuntu-rel/builds/13632 (and newer builds): ******************** TEST 'Clang :: Driver/x86_features.s' FAILED ******************** Test has no run line! ******************** I don't see this file in the repository. Could you (or one of your colleagues) take a look? Th...
2013 Apr 03
3
[LLVMdev] Debugging atom builds?
..., > > As someone working on ARM, we're interested in this sort of issue, to which > there's not yet a complete solution. Some advice below: > > > 2013/4/3 <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org>: >> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder > clang-atom-d2700-ubuntu-rel while building llvm. >> Full details are available at: >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-atom-d2700-ubuntu-rel/builds/7852 >> >> Buildbot URL: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/ >> >> Buildslave for this Build: atom1-buildbot >> >> Build R...
2020 May 18
6
[PATCH] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64
...FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along + * with this program; if not, visit the http://fsf.org website. + */ +/* + * Optimization target for get_checksum1 was the Intel Atom D2700, the + * slowest CPU in the test set and the most likely to be CPU limited during + * transfers. The combination of intrinsics was chosen specifically for the + * most gain on that CPU, other combinations were occasionally slightly + * faster on the others. + * + * While on more modern CPUs transfe...
2020 May 18
0
[PATCH] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64
...> + * GNU General Public License for more details. > + * > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along > + * with this program; if not, visit the http://fsf.org website. > + */ > +/* > + * Optimization target for get_checksum1 was the Intel Atom D2700, the > + * slowest CPU in the test set and the most likely to be CPU limited > during > + * transfers. The combination of intrinsics was chosen specifically for > the > + * most gain on that CPU, other combinations were occasionally slightly > + * faster on the others. > + * &g...
2020 May 19
5
[PATCHv2] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64
...OR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along + * with this program; if not, visit the http://fsf.org website. + */ +/* + * Optimization target for get_checksum1() was the Intel Atom D2700, the + * slowest CPU in the test set and the most likely to be CPU limited during + * transfers. The combination of intrinsics was chosen specifically for the + * most gain on that CPU, other combinations were occasionally slightly + * faster on the others. + * + * While on more modern CPUs transfe...
2020 May 18
2
[PATCH] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64
...blic License for more details. >> + * >> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along >> + * with this program; if not, visit the http://fsf.org website. >> + */ >> +/* >> + * Optimization target for get_checksum1 was the Intel Atom D2700, the >> + * slowest CPU in the test set and the most likely to be CPU limited during >> + * transfers. The combination of intrinsics was chosen specifically for the >> + * most gain on that CPU, other combinations were occasionally slightly >> + * faster on the others. >&...
2020 May 20
0
[PATCHv2] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64
...gt; + * GNU General Public License for more details. > + * > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along > + * with this program; if not, visit the http://fsf.org website. > + */ > +/* > + * Optimization target for get_checksum1() was the Intel Atom D2700, the > + * slowest CPU in the test set and the most likely to be CPU limited during > + * transfers. The combination of intrinsics was chosen specifically for the > + * most gain on that CPU, other combinations were occasionally slightly > + * faster on the others. > + * > + * Whi...
2020 May 18
3
[PATCH] SSE2/SSSE3 optimized version of get_checksum1() for x86-64
What do you base this on? Per https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/x86-Options.html : "For the x86-32 compiler, you must use -march=cpu-type, -msse or -msse2 switches to enable SSE extensions and make this option effective. For the x86-64 compiler, these extensions are enabled by default." That reads to me like we're fine for SSE2. As stated in my comments, SSSE3 support must be
2011 Dec 02
14
LSI 3GB HBA SAS Errors (and other misc)
During the diagnostics of my SAN failure last week we thought we had seen a backplane failure due to high error counts with ''lsiutil''. However, even with a new backplane and ruling out failed cards (MPXIO or singular) or bad cables I''m still seeing my error count with LSIUTIL increment. I''ve got no disks attached to the array right now so I''ve also
2012 Nov 22
19
ZFS Appliance as a general-purpose server question
A customer is looking to replace or augment their Sun Thumper with a ZFS appliance like 7320. However, the Thumper was used not only as a protocol storage server (home dirs, files, backups over NFS/CIFS/Rsync), but also as a general-purpose server with unpredictably-big-data programs running directly on it (such as corporate databases, Alfresco for intellectual document storage, etc.) in order to
2020 May 22
2
[PATCH] Optimized assembler version of md5_process() for x86-64
...+ */ +/* + * No modifications were made aside from changing the function and file names. + * The MD5_CTX structure as expected here (from OpenSSL) is binary compatible + * with the md_context used by rsync, for the fields accessed. + * + * Benchmarks (in MB/s) C ASM + * - Intel Atom D2700 302 334 + * - Intel i7-7700hq 351 376 + * - AMD ThreadRipper 2950x 728 784 + * + * The original code was also incorporated into OpenSSL. It has since been + * modified there. Those changes have not been made here due to licensing + * incompatibilities. Benchm...