Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "d26229".
Did you mean:
d26224
2016 Nov 02
2
RFC: Drop support for old style scalar TBAA
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26229 I've proposed dropping support for
old style scalar TBAA metadata.
Here is the proposed commit message:
"We've had support for auto upgrading old style scalar TBAA access
metadata into the "new" struct path aware TBAA metadata for 3 years now.
The only way to actually gene...
2016 Nov 08
2
RFC: Drop support for old style scalar TBAA
...d representation and reading it back in then the
> auto-upgrade logic will do the right thing for you. You do *not*
> need to do anything special here. However, I'd still appreciate it
> if can give me a thumbs-up or thumbs-down after doing some basic
> sanity testing with D26229 applied locally.
>
> - You'll only be affected by this change if you're creating IR in
> memory (for instance via the IRBuilder interface), use the old TBAA
> metadata representation and don't have an intermediate IR or
> bitcode parsing step that would have auto-u...