Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "d25035".
2016 Sep 28
6
[RFC] Require PRs for XFAILing tests
...a neat. In their python test harness, the attribute they use to denote expected failures supports a parameter for specifying the bug number. This got me thinking.
I believe that any test that is marked XFAIL is a bug, and we can use LIT to enforce that. So I wrote a patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D25035 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D25035>) to add a feature to LIT which would support mapping XFAILs to PRs, and a flag to turn XFAILS without PRs into failures.
My proposal is to add this feature to LIT (after proper code review, and I still need to write tests for it), and then to annotate all ou...