search for: d24167

...SVN repo here: http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/ and migrate this to a single repository. I was not sure if you were referring to this proposal (monorepo) or to the recent emails about “external libraries” that GCC uses like gmp and mpfr. You can find more details here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24167 If you have some good reasons why you would think a proposal would be problematic to you, or one would better fit your workflow, feel free to expose them now. Best, — Mehdi > > On Sep 3, 2016, at 7:37 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>&g...

...migrate this to a >> single repository. >> I was not sure if you were referring to this proposal (monorepo) or to >> the recent emails about “external libraries” that GCC uses like gmp >> and mpfr. >> >> You can find more details here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24167 >> >> If you have some good reasons why you would think a proposal would be >> problematic to you, or one would better fit your workflow, feel free >> to expose them now. > > It could be problematic for us depending on how the monorepository is > structured. We r...

As someone that has worked with both gcc and llvm, One thing about gcc that drives me bat-guano-crazy is that First you check out gcc, try to build it, and find that you also Need mpc, so you check that out and try to build it, and Find out you also need gmp, so you check that out and try To build it, and find out that you also need mpfr, ..... IE I'm in favor of a mono-repository. Also

> On Sep 3, 2016, at 3:04 PM, Patrice Kouame <pkouame at mac.com> wrote: > > > +1 for keeping it separate. Can you clarify what you referring to specifically? This sub thread (the last 4 messages) started with a mention of GCC dependencies. It is not clear to me how to relate to llvm now. Mehdi > > One can easily set up a git subproject structure if the need is

Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:08 AM, dag at cray.com wrote: > > Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > >> First, have you read this document: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24167 ? >> >> TLDR: The answer is no: you have to see it as it is today, i.e. a >> single SVN repo containing all the sub-projects, and “exports” in >> individual repositories. > >> The same thing after: a single git repo containing all the subprojects >> side-by-...