Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "d23736".
Did you mean:
23736
2016 Jul 19
4
RFC: Enabling Module passes post-ISel
Hi all,
I like all the ideas so far. Here are my thoughts:
I think that fundamentally users of LLVM should be able to opt-in to more
aggressive or intensive computation at compile time if they wish. Users'
needs differ, and while a 33% increase in clang LTO is absolutely out of
the question for some people, for those developing microcontrollers or HPC
applications that may well be