search for: d22353

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "d22353".

2016 Jul 15
5
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
...s in regular expressions - https://reviews.llvm.org/D22342 > Including files - https://reviews.llvm.org/D22344 > Expressions repeat for CHECK and CHECK-NEXT - > https://reviews.llvm.org/D22345 > CHECK-LABEL-DAG - https://reviews.llvm.org/D22348 > CHECK-WORD - https://reviews.llvm.org/D22353 > prefixes-regular expressions - https://reviews.llvm.org/D22401 > pattern templates - https://reviews.llvm.org/D22403. > > Thanks, > Elena. > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm....
2016 Jul 18
4
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
...vm.org/D22342 > >> Including files - https://reviews.llvm.org/D22344 > >> Expressions repeat for CHECK and CHECK-NEXT - > >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D22345 > >> CHECK-LABEL-DAG - https://reviews.llvm.org/D22348 > >> CHECK-WORD - https://reviews.llvm.org/D22353 > >> prefixes-regular expressions - https://reviews.llvm.org/D22401 > >> pattern templates - https://reviews.llvm.org/D22403. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Elena. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> LLVM Developers mailin...
2016 Aug 31
6
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
...comment and uploading changed patches. I made small summary report about features here, because there are some doubts about syntax of some features and changes in patches and it'll be great to know more opinions. >> >> 1. FileCheck Enhancement - CHECK-WORD (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22353) >> I replace special directives by flag --check-word, which turns on mode for each directive in file. It's obvious that this mode can be replaced using \b assert, but current regexp library doesn't have support of this assert and I have no answer to question about possibility of cha...
2016 Jul 19
2
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
Hi Elena, > On Jul 19, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I made new patches for most of changes with llvm-commits subscriber. But two patches were updated, because there are a lot of comments (patch for CHECK-WORD and patch for templates pattern). Will it be ok? IMO it's fine to keep some of the original
2016 Aug 24
9
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
...passed since last comment and uploading changed patches. I made small summary report about features here, because there are some doubts about syntax of some features and changes in patches and it'll be great to know more opinions. 1. FileCheck Enhancement - CHECK-WORD (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22353) I replace special directives by flag --check-word, which turns on mode for each directive in file. It's obvious that this mode can be replaced using \b assert, but current regexp library doesn't have support of this assert and I have no answer to question about possibility of change curre...
2016 Sep 01
2
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
...changed patches. I made small summary report about features here, because there are some doubts about syntax of some features and changes in patches and it'll be great to know more opinions. >>> >>> 1. FileCheck Enhancement - CHECK-WORD >>> (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22353) I replace special directives by flag --check-word, which turns on mode for each directive in file. It's obvious that this mode can be replaced using \b assert, but current regexp library doesn't have support of this assert and I have no answer to question about possibility of change curre...
2016 Sep 01
2
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
...changed patches. I made small summary report about features here, because there are some doubts about syntax of some features and changes in patches and it'll be great to know more opinions. >>> >>> 1. FileCheck Enhancement - CHECK-WORD >>> (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22353) I replace special directives by flag --check-word, which turns on mode for each directive in file. It's obvious that this mode can be replaced using \b assert, but current regexp library doesn't have support of this assert and I have no answer to question about possibility of change curre...
2016 Sep 05
2
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
...ches. I made small summary report about features here, because there are some doubts about syntax of some features and changes in patches and it'll be great to know more opinions. >>>> >>>> 1. FileCheck Enhancement - CHECK-WORD >>>> (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22353) I replace special directives by flag --check-word, which turns on mode for each directive in file. It's obvious that this mode can be replaced using \b assert, but current regexp library doesn't have support of this assert and I have no answer to question about possibility of change curre...
2016 May 27
1
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
Hi all, I' ll be glad to hear more opinions and may be some suggestions how to improve new features (may be there are ideas how template descriptions can be done simplier). After we try to accept your ideas and opinions to make new FileCheck features better. I will make changes and publish separate patches a month later, because I'll take a holiday in June. Thanks, Elena. -----Original
2016 May 27
3
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
Hi Paul, Thank you for information about the [[:space:]] character-class. About performance I tested on Clang/LLVM test suite. I try to profile and the problem is that I used regular expressions a lot for supporting some new features and functions in your regex library are very slow . Regex library is very old and quite awkward, in my opinion. May be you will see some ways to improve performance,