Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "d21987".
Did you mean:
d21982
2016 Aug 23
2
[XRay][RFC] Tooling for XRay Trace Analysis
Hi llvm-dev,
I've been implementing a tool for analysing XRay traces. A recap of XRay's original RFC [0] mentions a tool that does function call accounting as a starting point. This is implemented currently in D21987 [1], and is being reviewed by David Blaikie.
One key issue in that review is the dependency between the log format determined by the XRay runtime implementation in compiler-rt [2] and the tool reading these log entries.
While it seems obvious that we should document clearly the file format of the...
2016 Jul 20
2
[XRay] Build instrumented Clang, some analysis results
...stops when the main thread exits.
Just a quick update, I have some patches under review that when applied cleanly to LLVM and compiler-rt allows for building applications with XRay tracing enabled on Linux binaries from start to end. The list of patches to apply are:
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D21987 (accounting tool, lives in llvm)
* https://reviews.llvm.org/D21612 then https://reviews.llvm.org/D21982 (compiler-rt XRay runtime implementation)
To test this out, I built clang with XRay and ran it on a hello world application. Here's how I did it:
1) Build clang+compiler-rt with the above...
2016 Nov 30
0
RFC: XRay in the LLVM Library
...a preference between the two options provided above?
- Any other alternatives we should consider?
- Which parts of which options do you prefer, and is there a synthesis of either of those options that appeals to you?
Thanks in advance!
[0] - `llvm-xray extract` defined in https://reviews.llvm.org/D21987
[1] - `llvm-xray convert` being reviewed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D24376
[2] - FDR mode ongoing implementation (work in progress) at https://reviews.llvm.org/D27038
[3] - Buffer Queue implementation (work in progress) at https://reviews.llvm.org/D26232
-- Dean
_________________________________...
2016 Nov 30
5
RFC: XRay in the LLVM Library
...a preference between the two options provided above?
- Any other alternatives we should consider?
- Which parts of which options do you prefer, and is there a synthesis of either of those options that appeals to you?
Thanks in advance!
[0] - `llvm-xray extract` defined in https://reviews.llvm.org/D21987
[1] - `llvm-xray convert` being reviewed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D24376
[2] - FDR mode ongoing implementation (work in progress) at https://reviews.llvm.org/D27038
[3] - Buffer Queue implementation (work in progress) at https://reviews.llvm.org/D26232
-- Dean
2016 Sep 09
2
[XRay][RFC] Tooling for XRay Trace Analysis
...s at gmail.com <mailto:dean.berris at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi llvm-dev,
>
> I've been implementing a tool for analysing XRay traces. A recap of XRay's original RFC [0] mentions a tool that does function call accounting as a starting point. This is implemented currently in D21987 [1], and is being reviewed by David Blaikie.
>
> One key issue in that review is the dependency between the log format determined by the XRay runtime implementation in compiler-rt [2] and the tool reading these log entries.
>
> While it seems obvious that we should document clearly th...